|
Bush proposes 26-point immigration plan; it immediately draws HIAS, Feinstein fire WASHINGTON D.C. (Press Release)— Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and Commerce Secretary Carlos Gutierrez today announced a series of reforms the Administration will pursue to address border security and immigration challenges. The following reforms represent steps the Administration can take within the boundaries of existing law to secure our borders more effectively, improve interior and worksite enforcement, streamline existing guest worker programs, improve the current immigration system, and help new immigrants assimilate into American culture. BORDER SECURITY 1. The administration will continue to strengthen security at the border with additional personnel and infrastructure. We are committed to implementing the following border security measures by December 31, 2008:
from China, the former Soviet Union, and El Salvador. Today, the President is directing the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to expand this list of dangerous organized gangs from other nations and to ensure that members of those gangs are barred from entry into the United States.
4. The
Administration will expand exit requirements so persons who overstay
limited-duration visits to the United States can be identified.
(Jump to continuation) ![]() Please click on above advertisement to visit the website Feinstein says administration plan a mere 'band-aid'; faults it for not solving agricultural worker crisis WASHINGTON (Press Release)— U.S. Senator Dianne Feinstein (Democrat, California) today issued a statement in response to the Bush Administration’s announcement of more than two dozen steps it plans to take to tighten the borders, enforce immigration laws currently on the books, and improve some of the visa programs already in place. Senator Feinstein highlighted the ongoing need to pass legislation to address the agriculture worker shortages. Earlier this year, Senators Feinstein and Larry Craig (Republican, Indiana) introduced legislation, known as AgJOBS, that would ensure a stable, reliable supply of agricultural workers. The following is Senator Feinstein’s statement: “The Administration’s approach is a Band-Aid that will not stop the looming crisis American agriculture will face this fall. The crisis is that crops will not be harvested. Our nation’s $260 billion agriculture industry depends largely on undocumented workers. Today, it is estimated that at least 70 percent of the workers who plant, prune, and harvest American fruits and vegetables are undocumented. Without them, American farmers will not be able to fully harvest their crops. We have found over the years that there simply are not enough Americans willing to do this work. Today’s farm workers are highly skilled – they know how to harvest, how to pack, how to can. To take this workforce away would collapse the industry. In fact, we’ve already started to see the effect of worker shortages across the country: In Michigan, farmers lost 20 percent of their asparagus crop earlier this year because they didn’t have enough workers; In Washington, raspberries have died on the vine because there was no one available to pick them; In Georgia, melon farmers report that their crops are in danger of spoiling because their labor is short; In Idaho, there was an 18 percent shortage of farmworkers last year and potato growers predict greater labor shortages for the current cycle; and In North Carolina, farmers lost nearly a third of their cucumber crop last year because of worker shortages. Thus far in California, more than 11,000 jobs have been transferred to Mexico and 46,000 acres of Mexican farmland have been taken over by California farmers. The farmers simply cannot count on a farm labor crew to harvest their crops in the United States. The result of that transfer is a loss of market share, with Americans becoming more and more dependent on foreign food sources. And the food products that come into the United States present phytosanitary and pesticide concerns, from a country where there is little control on either of these. Secondly, if China is able to get a foothold on the American apple market and we see the importation of cheap apples, the American apple market will be decimated. There is not an administrative solution, and tinkering with regulations is not going to solve the problem. Therefore, we must pass a law that enables agricultural workers to continue working legally if they stay in agriculture for the next three to five years and meet other requirements. This is what AgJOBS does. In a couple of weeks, there is going to be catastrophe. The new regulations regarding no-match letters may require employers to fire every employee with an ‘unmatched’ Social Security number within 90 days, or face civil and criminal penalties.
Come
September, farmers will find themselves without enough help just as the fall
harvest begins. That’s why it is absolutely critical that we create a stable
and reliable supply of labor. The price of inaction is too high.”
For more information about Tifereth Israel please click on this ad
By Donald H. Harrison (Return to top) Commentary Some proposed parameters for U.S. immigration By Sheila Orysiek SAN DIEGO—A forum question asked: "How should the Jewish community respond to U.S. Senator Arlen Specter's new immigration proposal?" I do think that Sen. Arlen Specter's suggestion is a way forward. That being said let me go on to the question of "What should be the response of the Jewish Community - a community of immigrants to this country." All the people in this country are immigrants. However, there is little resemblance between the illegal immigrants pouring across our borders today and the historical Jewish immigrant. The Jewish community came here - overwhelmingly - as LEGAL immigrants for the most part fleeing real centuries long persecution. This includes my mother and all four of my grandparents. My mother and grandmother waited six years in Romania as aliens (after having escaped Russia on a raft at night) to qualify under the quota system in the USA. They didn't come here for jobs - they came here to escape persecution and certain death. As a Jew born in 1941, I understand the necessity for succor - but I don't understand sneaking into this country for a job and then demanding "rights." Let me take this in sections..... Border Security: Border security must be paramount in these days of terrorist threats. A country exists as an entity because of adherence and respect for its borders and laws. Israel is a prime example of how borders define a country and how important it is to respect those borders. So, as near to absolute border security as possible must come first. Temporary Worker Program: A well planned temporary guest worker program for those who wish to come here temporarily for seasonal jobs. I don't want them to come under unsafe conditions as they do now; paying huge amounts of money to coyotés who then abandon them, or have them trekking through the desert, or getting robbed, hurt, stuffed into trucks and cars. A safe, sane guest worker program so they can come - and go - with respect - unexploited by employers, and unafraid of being hunted or victimized. That's for our benefit as well as theirs. Permanent Immigrants: Must enter the country legally - going through the established channels. Anchor Babies: The law should be changed to eliminate this loophole. If the parents are here illegally - having broken our laws to get here - a child born of such parents on American soil should not automatically be an American citizen. Family Unification: Only available for those who have gone through all the channels to obtain legal citizenship. Anything else forfeits this opportunity. Family unification is not a "right" - but a privilege. Anyone who disrespects our laws forfeits that privilege. The family must show it is capable and willing to support its members. That's what my family had to do. Employers: Any employer who knowingly employs illegal immigrants is also breaking the law and should be penalized. The government needs to enforce this - the employer is as guilty as the illegal worker. I do realize the problem of the difficulty the employer faces in trying to identify who is legally here and who is not - but a full faith effort must be made on the part of the employer. Illegals already here: While by law they should indeed be deported - in reality it isn't going to happen. I think Specter's idea is workable (unless I learn otherwise), they should apply for green cards, if denied because of criminal records or other solid reasons - deported. Otherwise they should stay here as green card holders. However, for citizenship they must go back to their country of origin and begin the process just like millions of others have done and are doing. Being here illegally should not give them privileged access to citizenship - it's not a good beginning to life in a new country to start by breaking the law. And finally: Jews are indeed an immigrant community - but we are not law breakers and we have never condoned breaking internationally recognized law. We are not talking here about laws aimed at persecution such as the Nuremberg laws - by which a country set up a body of laws to persecute its own people. The Torah is a body of law and we pride ourselves on receiving that law and trying our best to live by it. It has taught us respect and the necessity for a law abiding society. Since when have we, as Jews, advocated breaking of legitimate civil law? It is the recognized right of every country to set up a system whereby aliens can apply for entrance - a country without borders and without law is not a country. As Jews we have much to lose if the law is disrespected - think of all the times we appeal to the law to protect us. We can't be selective. The immigration laws of the United States are not inhumane - the test of that pudding are the millions who have applied and been accepted.
I thank G-D that my
family was able to learn how America's immigration law worked, went through
the channels and entered the country with respect on both sides. I wouldn't
be alive to write this had there not been those laws.
|
||||||||||||||
|
P.M. Fayad for paying Hamas salares in Gaza JERUSALEM (Press Release) –House Republican Chief Deputy Whip Eric Cantor (Republican, Virginia), Chairman of the Taskforce on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, sent the following letter to Palestinian Authority Prime Minister Salam Fayad today in response to the PA’s decision to pay the salaries of members of the terrorist organization Hamas: “Dear Prime Minister Fayad – Thank you for meeting with me and the rest of the United States Congressional Republican delegation on Wednesday, August 8th. While I was pleased to hear your reassurances that the Palestinian Authority will continue to isolate Hamas, the events of the past twenty-four hours have given me reason to question your representations. You can imagine my shock and disappointment the following morning, when our delegation learned from newspaper reports that your government is providing financial assistance to Hamas. This came less than twenty-four hours after you looked me and several other U.S. Congressmen in the eye and vowed that your government would not seek rapprochement with Hamas. Hamas is a terrorist organization whose mission it is to murder innocent civilians and destroy the state of Israel. There is no place for Hamas in your government and no room for their ideology among the Palestinian people. Without further explanation from you, I will feel compelled, upon returning to Washington, to forewarn my colleagues in the Congress that any visits with your government offer little value toward bringing peace and security to Palestinians and Israelis. Furthermore, I will help lead opposition in Congress to any proposed call for additional U.S. taxpayer dollars being sent to the Palestinian Authority. Peace and security in the Middle East will never be achieved without trust. I am pained by these events, and sincerely hope you will end your involvement with the terrorist organization Hamas. I look forward to your timely response explaining the misuse of U.S. taxpayer dollars.” The preceding story was provided by U.S. Rep. Eric Cantor, who currently is leading a delegation of Republican members of Congress on a visit to Israel Which U.S. college presidents have opposed the proposed academic boycott of Israel? Here's list NEW YORK (Press Release)—The following college and university presidents and chancellors have endorsed a statement by Columbia University President Lee Bollinger denouncing the United Kingdom’s University and College Union decision to promote a boycott of Israeli educational institutions. The American Jewish committee published as a public service the Bollinger statement and most of the names below in a full-page ad in The New York Times on August 8. We will continue to add names to this list. Any president who wishes to join should send an email to Harold Shapiro, president emeritus of Princeton University, at shapiroh@ajc.org.
California Institute of the Arts
Steven D. Lavine; California National
University for Advanced Studies L. Lolly Horn; California State
University-Fresno John D. Welty; California State University-Long
Beach F. King Alexander; Carnegie Mellon University Jared L.
Cohon; Catholic Theological
Union Rev. Donald Senior;
Central College David H. Roe; Central Connecticut State
University John W. Miller; Chamberlain College of Nursing
Susan L. Groenwald; Chatham College Esther L. Barazzone; The
Chicago School of Professional Psychology Michael Horowitz, Ph.D.;
The City College of New York Gregory H. Williams; The City
University of New York Matthew Goldstein; Claremont McKenna
College: Pamela B. Gann; Clark University John E. Bassett;
Clemson University James F. Barker; Cleveland State
University Michael Schwartz; Coe College James R. Phifer;
Cogswell Polytechnical College Chester D. Haskell; Colby College
William D. Adams; Colgate University Rebecca Chopp;
College of New Jersey R. Barbara Gitenstein; College of William
and Mary Gene R. Nichol;
Columbia College Chicago
Warrick L. Carter; Connecticut CollegeLeo
I. Higdon, Jr.; Cornell University David J. Skorton;
U.S. may need to accept Iraqi,
Afghan refugees This is a slogan appropriate not only for shops that sell glassware and other delicate objects, but also for countries.
The United
States made a major contribution to breaking Vietnam and Cambodia,
with the result that there are substantial communities in the U.S.
that began as refugees admitted by administrations that admitted to
responsibility for their dislocation. No question, in my mind, that the United States broke Iraq. To be sure, the regime of Saddam Hussein was ugly, especially toward non-Sunni communities. However, the several reasons for attacking in 2003 are mired in controversy, and are a long way from having garnered significant support since then. Today's New York Times features a heart-rendering article on lives broken by what has happened in Iraq. My initial suggestion is to stop the aid given to the Palestinians by the United Nations and various non-governmental organizations, and give it to Iraqis. The Palestinians have had enough time, in almost 60 years, to put their lives in order. The real crisis is now elsewhere. That will not happen. There are too many Arab and Muslim votes in the United Nations, and so many years invested by non-governmental organizations in developing sympathy for the Palestinians, and setting up their infrastructure (and hiring Palestinians) in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, Jordan and elsewhere. The Vietnamese and Cambodians have been living in the United States long enough to have moved out, or to be ready to move out of their initial neighborhoods. Welcome to the Iraqis. The New York Times article indicates that the bulk of refugees are likely to be those not enthused about supporting any of the players in the civil war that has emerged out of the American invasion. Many will be hard working and educated middle class strivers. If we can make some guesses about what has happened elsewhere, it is their children, not feeling part of American culture, who will fill the Madrasas and begin causing the troubles apparent in Britain, France, and Pakistan. So George W. Bush and his supporters have, perhaps, a generation to bring democracy to the Iraqis (in Iraq or elsewhere) before they risk breaking their own country. The story of Afghanistan is something else. If that country was broken, the Russians contributed at least as much as the Americans. Or it may be closer to the truth to say that Afghanistan never was a real country. Insofar as it had never been put together, no one can claim responsibility for breaking it. There was more reason for the United States to attack the Taliban regime after 9-11 than there was to attack Iraq. More recently, in a repeat of what has been seen before in the cycles of Afghan history, the Taliban are coming back. Pakistan was the favored place of Afghan refugees from the Russians and the Taliban. Lots of them would prefer the United States. Some years ago, a young man in a village about 100 miles from Kabul asked me how long it took to get to the United States by bus. He had never heard of the ocean. There will be much to do for American school teachers as well as social workers and landlords. And for security personnel. The bit I know about Afghan and Iraqi culture tells me that the Afghans will be quicker to send their children to the Madrasas for schooling. Good luck.
Poland's President Kaczynski condemns desecrations In a letter to the head of the Jewish cultural and social association of Czestochowa, Halina Wasilewicz, the President wrote "This act of aggression is unusually shocking, especially because the Czestochowa graveyard belongs to one of the most impressive Jewish cemeteries in Poland. This act of hate serves not only an act of aggression against the place and respect for the dead, but against the heritage of Czestochowa, against the common history of its Polish and Jewish residents." Kaczynski has won praise from Poland's Jewish community in the past for supporting Jewish cultural projects and for condemning past acts of anti-Semitism. Poland's chief rabbi, Michal Schudrich, said the president's latest letter also sends an important message, that “while anti-Semitism does exist in Poland, as it does tragically in other countries, in today's Poland such hatred will never be tolerated."
The preceding story was provided by the World Jewish Congress
DVAR TORAH: Tzedaka Law demands that a poor person not be turned away SAN DIEGO—This week's tale: Rav Pappa was climbing a ladder when he suddenly began to slip. He grappled for a moment, then caught himself before falling. He was gripped with trepidation because he understood this as a sign from heaven that he had done something that was deemed worthy of death penalty. Rav Chiya suggested that perhaps Rav Pappa had failed to give tzedaka (charity) to a poor person. The Talmud teaches, "One who hides his eyes from tzedaka is considered as one who serves idols." Idol worship is punishable by death. The Maharsha (Baba Basra 10A) says that Rav Chiya was hinting to the following incident: Once a poor person came to Rav Pappa, who was in charge of the communal charity fund, for a donation from the fund. Rav Pappa denied him because this man was also going from door to door for donations and the law stated, "When a poor person collects from door to door, he is not given a gift from the communal fund." Rav Samma rebuked him saying, "If you don't give him, than others will not give and he will die." Rav Pappa responded, "What can I do? The law states 'When a poor person collects from door to door, he is not given a gift from the communal fund.' " Rav Samma retorted, "He is not given a large gift, but he is given small token gift." Rav Moshe Dov Harris explained that Rav Pappa could not be considered as one who "hides his eyes from tzedaka" just because he did not know a law. Rather, Rav Pappa failed to deduce the law because he lacked empathy towards the plight of the poor person. In addition to transferring funds, the mitzvah of tzedaka requires that one be sensitive to the plight of the poor person and feel his pain. Had Rav Pappa put himself in the poor man's shoes, he would have realized that 'no gift' could not be an option and therefore a small token gift must be in order. Rav Pappa's failing was in the essential mitzvah of tzedaka and thus is tantamount to Idol worship. How important it is for us to be constantly and acutely tuned in to the feelings of others. Dedicated by Dr. Scott A. Magnes in honor of Dr. & Mrs. J. Hennessey.
Our Webalizer program tells us the number of visitors to our website, usually over 3,000 per day. So we know you are out there. But, so far, our forum questions have not elicited much response from readers. Should we keep the feature? Should we change it somehow to be more reflective of your interests? Please let us know. In fact, we will make that our weekend forum question: "How can the Forum feature of San Diego Jewish World be improved?" Meanwhile, our columnist Sheila Orysiek (who writes with equal comfort about the ballet and world affairs) has written a column to help kick off the immigration debate. We print it above, and will also post it to the string of commentary for Topic #4-immigration. Your comments are welcome, indeed solicited, on immigration as well as any of the previous topics. Here are links to the various forum discussions underway. #4 What do you think of Senator Arlen Specter's proposal to grant green cards rather than citizenship to the undocumented workers already in this country? #3 Holocaust history and the Bergson group #2 Removal of Jewish residents from Hebron #1 A protest and the letter; did NJDC help or harm? To share your thoughts on any of these topics, please send an email to us at sdheritage@cox.net. Please be sure to include at the bottom of your letter your full name and the city and state (province) in which you reside. ________________
COMMUNITY CURRENTS—Tifereth Israel Synagogue is staging a sale on Judaica and other items at its Traditions Gift Shop off the main lobby of the sanctuary building at 6660 Cowles Mountain Boulevard. There are 50 percent discounts on jewelry and kiddush cups, and 20 percent discounts on other items except parchments and candles. the sale lasts through September 30... CYBER-REFERRALS—Israel's Consulate General in Los Angeles passes along a story on YNET that guerrilla bands of Fatah loyalists have been infiltrating the Gaza Strip and have been performing acts of sabotage against Hamas in Gaza. Here is a link to the story... StandWithUs refers us to a story in the Jerusalem Post about a professor of Palestine University in Gaza who was kidnapped by Hamas authorities and forced to convert from Christianity to Islam. Here is the link.
Prior to serving as a vice principal, he was project coordinator with the Success for All Foundation. This school reform program was developed at Johns Hopkins University and is currently used in over 3,000 K-5 schools nation-wide. During these three years, Mr. Sussman observed, assessed and provided specific feedback to over 100 K-5 teachers. He reviewed school wide data and worked with school and district staff to design appropriate interventions to meet the needs of all students. Sussman served for three years as an instructor for the Maryland State Department of Education where he wrote curriculum in the area of teaching elementary Mathematics, in which he developed theories, methods and current practices. Sussman has been a classroom teacher at both primary and intermediate grade levels. He has taught gifted students in grades K-5 and has worked with special needs students in inclusion classrooms. “I am honored to be joining this premier learning institution,” he said. “San Diego Jewish Academy will continue to be focused on meeting the needs of each individual student. Through our rigorous general studies and Judaic curriculum, students are given the opportunity to reach their full academic, social, and emotional potential in a nurturing educational environment. I am grateful for the opportunity to be a part of the students, parents, and staff members that make up the San Diego Jewish Academy family.” San Diego Jewish Academy extended another warm welcome to Rabbi Leslie Lipson, formerly a congregational Rabbi in New Jersey, who has been appointed as Maimonides Upper School Dean of Jewish Studies for the 2007-08 school year. Rabbi Lipson recently completed the Avi Chai Foundation's Day School Leadership Training. In addition to his ordination, Rabbi Lipson received a Masters in Education from the Jewish Theological Seminary in New York. Rabbi Lipson has earned an MBA in International Economics from York University and his B.A. is in history with a minor in economics from Haverford College. He has taught Bible and Modern Israeli History in Jewish day schools, served as the Director of Education in supplemental schools, and has served as a counselor and educator at Camp Ramah for five years. He has served as pulpit rabbi for almost ten years and is a Fellow of the Jewish Day School Leadership Training Institute.
Rabbi Lipson is married to Adina Lipson,
a California native. They have four children: Rebecca, Hannah, Yardena,
and Eitan. Rabbi Lipson looks forward to bringing to SDJA his passion
for Jewish learning and his philosophical commitment to integrating
Torah and Modernity.
The class will be instructed by Donald H.
Harrison, publisher of San Diego Jewish World, and former reporter for
the San Diego Union, Jewish Press-Heritage and Jewish Times. SDJA has one of the most technologically advanced campuses around the country, with Smart Boards in every classroom and more than 650 fully networked computers throughout the school. An extensive offering of extracurricular activities, sports, performing and fine arts programs enable SDJA students to develop s |